|
| Course Description |
|
| Course Name |
: |
Seminar |
|
| Course Code |
: |
YLTBS-101 |
|
| Course Type |
: |
Optional |
|
| Level of Course |
: |
Second Cycle |
|
| Year of Study |
: |
1 |
|
| Course Semester |
: |
Fall (16 Weeks) |
|
| ECTS |
: |
6 |
|
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
: |
Prof.Dr. HALİS ARIOĞLU
Prof.Dr. RÜŞTÜ HATİPOĞLU
Prof.Dr. MENŞURE ÖZGÜVEN
Prof.Dr. HAKAN ÖZKAN
Prof.Dr. HASAN GÜLCAN
Prof.Dr. MÜJDE KOÇ
Prof.Dr. VEYİS TANSI
Prof.Dr. TACETTİN YAĞBASANLAR
Prof.Dr. A.EMİN ANLARSAL
Prof.Dr. LEYLA SEZEN TANSI
Prof.Dr. SALİHA KIRICI
Assoc.Prof.Dr. CELALEDDİN BARUTÇULAR
Assoc.Prof.Dr. ÖZGÜL GÖRMÜŞ
Asst.Prof.Dr. NURİ SEZER SİNAN
|
|
| Learning Outcomes of the Course |
: |
The student is expected to gain proficiency in drawing an extant literature when formulating a research question and/or conducting research
Gains an awareness of ethical principles in research and appriciates them
Gain skills in reviewing, analyzing and interpreting existing knowledge that is needed for solving scientific problems
Is able to report the knowledge gained through literature review via an article based on scientific procedures and principles
Is able to write an article based on the academic principles using the knowledge through the literature review
|
|
| Mode of Delivery |
: |
Face-to-Face |
|
| Prerequisites and Co-Prerequisites |
: |
None |
|
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
: |
None |
|
| Aim(s) of Course |
: |
The objectives of this course are to guide students in reading literature in a specific area, and to help students discuss, interpret, present and synthesize knowledge in the area of their research |
|
| Course Contents |
: |
The seminar is a required part of the graduate program. It involves classifying information and documentary facts, and writing and presenting findings and results in a scientific manner |
|
| Language of Instruction |
: |
Turkish |
|
| Work Place |
: |
Class |
|
|
Course Outline /Schedule (Weekly) Planned Learning Activities |
| Week | Subject | Student's Preliminary Work | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
1 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
2 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
3 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
4 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
5 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
6 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
7 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
8 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
9 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
10 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
11 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
12 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
13 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
14 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
15 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
16/17 |
Literature review on research topic, preparation for seminar |
None |
Lecture, discussion |
|
|
|
Required Course Resources |
| Resource Type | Resource Name |
| Recommended Course Material(s) |
 All material recommended by advisor
|
| |
| Required Course Material(s) | |
|
|
|
Assessment Methods and Assessment Criteria |
|
Semester/Year Assessments |
Number |
Contribution Percentage |
|
Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) |
5 |
60 |
|
Homeworks/Projects/Others |
2 |
40 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
Rate of Semester/Year Assessments to Success |
40 |
| |
|
Final Assessments
|
100 |
|
Rate of Final Assessments to Success
|
60 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
|
| Contribution of the Course to Key Learning Outcomes |
| # | Key Learning Outcome | Contribution* |
|
1 |
Graduates become a specialist on the field crops area by improving their skills. |
5 |
|
2 |
They comprehend interdisciplinary interaction in his specialization area. |
5 |
|
3 |
They can follow the latest developments in field crops area and get access to the knowledge source, gather this knowledge, reach new knowledge and synthesize by evaluating available studies and follow the innovations in his field. |
5 |
|
4 |
They can synthesize and interpret interdisciplinary knowledge by using theoretical and practical skills at a specialist level in field crops area. |
5 |
|
5 |
They find solutions for problems related to field crops by using research methods and establish cause effect relationships. |
5 |
|
6 |
They incorporate their knowledge on his special area by combining their knowledge with those from the other scientific areas and produce new knowledge and also solve the problems by using scientific research methods. |
5 |
|
7 |
They determine a problem independently in field crops subject, provide solutions, evaluate the results and implement whenever required. |
5 |
|
8 |
They are qualified to solve a problem in their field. |
4 |
|
9 |
They are equipped with analytical and critical thinking ability to direct their learning and to conduct advanced studies in their fields independently. |
3 |
|
10 |
They transfer current developments and their own studies in the field crops area systematically to the his working group and to different groups from other study fields orally or visually by supporting them with qualitative and quantitive data. |
5 |
|
11 |
They study and improve the social relationships and standards leading these relationship by a critical point of view and take action when needed. |
0 |
|
12 |
They develop policy, strategy and experimental plans related to field crops area and evaluate obtained results within the framework of quality processes. |
0 |
|
13 |
They are sensitive about scientific and ethical values during the collection, interpretion and announcement of data related to their subject.They are also capable of teaching and checking these values. |
3 |
|
14 |
They are able to understand and translate an article written in a foreign language. |
0 |
| * Contribution levels are between 0 (not) and 5 (maximum). |
|
|
| Student Workload - ECTS |
| Works | Number | Time (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
| Course Related Works |
|
Class Time (Exam weeks are excluded) |
14 |
5 |
70 |
|
Out of Class Study (Preliminary Work, Practice) |
14 |
5 |
70 |
| Assesment Related Works |
|
Homeworks, Projects, Others |
2 |
5 |
10 |
|
Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
Final Exam |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total Workload: | 150 |
| Total Workload / 25 (h): | 6 |
| ECTS Credit: | 6 |
|
|
|