Main Page     Information on the Institution     Degree Programs     General Information for Students     Türkçe  

 DEGREE PROGRAMS


 Associate's Degree (Short Cycle)


 Bachelor’s Degree (First Cycle)


 Master’s Degree (Second Cycle)

  Course Description
Course Name : Text Restoration

Course Code : İTS 723

Course Type : Optional

Level of Course : Second Cycle

Year of Study : 1

Course Semester : Fall (16 Weeks)

ECTS : 4

Name of Lecturer(s) : Assoc.Prof.Dr. NURAN ÖZTÜRK

Learning Outcomes of the Course : Knows text restoration terms.
Comprehends the relationship between text restoration, text critique and text publication.
Learns the methods and principals of text restoration.
Can criticise restoration of a text.
Can evaluate publications according to text restoration.
Understands the boundaries and limitations of text restoration.

Mode of Delivery : Face-to-Face

Prerequisites and Co-Prerequisites : İTS 705 Text Analysis of Turkish-Islamic Literature I

Recommended Optional Programme Components : None

Aim(s) of Course : The aim is to teach how to cope with the challenges of reading torn and erroneous texts in the manuscripts and printed books.

Course Contents : Students will be provided with information about theoretical and practical knowledge of text restoration.

Language of Instruction : Turkish

Work Place : Postgraduate classroom


  Course Outline /Schedule (Weekly) Planned Learning Activities
Week Subject Student's Preliminary Work Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
1 General information about manuscripts (manuscript, publication, copy of the author, based on copies / original copies, author, copyist, zahriyeh, haşiye / tebyîz, tesvîd, reddade and temmet´s registration, etc.). Ünver, İsmail (1993), “Eski Türk Edebiyatı İle İlgili Sorunlarımız”, Türk Dili, S. 500, p. 118-126. Dosay, Melek-Remzi Demir (1995), “Bilim Tarihinde Metin Çalışmalarının Önemi” Felsefe Dünyası, S. 7, p. 60-69. Lecture Practice Question-answer
2 Text Analysis,Text Criticism, Text Restoration: the differences, definitions, scopes, purposes Ateş, Ahmed (1941-1942), “Metin Tenkidi Hakkında”, Türkiyat Mecmuası, vol. VII-VIII, p. 253-267. Mengi, Mine (1997), “Metin Şerhi, Metin Tahlili ve Metin Tenkidi Üzerine Görüşler”, Dergâh, S. 93,p.8-10. Lecture Practice Question-answer
3 introduction of the publications on text restoration Kılıç, Atabey (2004), “Günümüzde Metin Neşri veya Edisyon Kritik: Genel Görünümler, Problemler, Öneriler”, I. Kırşehir Kültür Araştırmaları Bilgi Şöleni, 8-10 Ekim 2003, Kırşehir, Proceedings, p. 331-346. Lecture Practice Question-answer
4 The adequacy of researcher to make restoration on the text İlaydın, Hikmet (1972), “Metin Sağlamlığı Sorunu”, Türk Dili, vol. 26, S. 250, p. 286-291 Lecture Practice Question-answer
5 Describing the concepts of deficiency/incorrectness on samples Yıldırım, Ali (2007), Metin Tenkidi İle İlgili Hususlar ve Kâmî Divanı Örneği”, II. Kayseri ve Yöresi Kültür, Sanat ve Edebiyat Bilgi Şöleni, 10-12 Nisan 2006, Proceedings, Kayseri, p.799-811. Lecture Practice Question-answer
6 Text correction, text completion, text determination M. Fatih Köksal, "Metin Tamiri, Usul ve Esaslar Bazı Teklifler", Tenkit ve Teori, İstanbul 2012, Kesit Pub., p. 43-61. Lecture Practice Question-answer
7 borders and limitations of text restoration Tulum, Mertol (1983), “Filolojik Çalışma ve Eski Metinlerin Neşri Üzerine Görüş ve Tenkitler”, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, S. 27, p.1-8. Lecture Practice Question-answer
8 Mid-term exam Exam preparation mid-term exam
9 Text restoration exercises I (rhyme / meter presumption) Kut, Günay (1999), “Metin Tespitinde Birinci Aşama: Vezin ve Anlam”, İlmî Araştırmalar, S. 8., p. 189-198. Lecture Practice Question-answer
10 Text restoration exercises II (meaning / grammar presumption) Pekolcay, Necla (1985), “İslâmî Türk Edebiyatına Dair Metinlerde Sentaksın Önemi”, V. Milletlerarası Türkoloji Kongresi, 23-28 Eylül 1985, Tebliğler Türk Dili, vol. I, İstanbul, p. 215-219. Lecture Practice Question-answer
11 Text restoration exercises III (taking into account the special features of text and the author) Çeltik, Halil (1996), “Tenkitli Metin Yöntemi Açısından Üç Şeyh Galib Divanı”, Bilig, S.2, p. 284-289. Lecture Practice Question-answer
12 Text restoration exercises IV (taking into account the special features of text and the author) Aksoyak, İ. Hakkı (2007), “Kefeli Hüseyin’in Raznâme Adlı Eserinde Nüsha Ailesi Kurmada İzlenen Yöntem”, II. Kayseri ve Yöresi Kültür, Sanat ve Edebiyat Bilgi Şöleni, 10-12 Nisan 2006, proceedings, Kayseri, p. 635-641. Lecture Practice Question-answer
13 Views on the published works (Divan publications) Çeltik, Halil (2007), “Tenkitli Divan Metinlerinde Nazım Şekilleri Problemleri”, II. Kayseri ve Yöresi Kültür, Sanat ve Edebiyat Bilgi Şöleni, 10-12 Nisan 2006, Kayseri, p. 696-705. Lecture Practice Question-answer
14 Views on the published works (Mesnevi publications) Ünver, İsmail (1993), “Çeviriyazıda Yazım Birliği Üzerine Öneriler”, Türkoloji Dergisi, Vol.11, p.51-89 Lecture Practice Question-answer
15 Views on the published works (prose publications) Ünver, İsmail (1992), “Arap Harfli Türkçe Metinlerin Çevirisinde Karşılaşılan Yanlışlar”, Türk Dili, S. 483, p. 789-798. Lecture Practice Question-answer
16/17 Final exam Exam preparation written exam


  Required Course Resources
Resource Type Resource Name
Recommended Course Material(s)  Ali Nihad Tarlan, Edebiyat Mes’eleleri, İstanbul 1981, Ötüken Yay.
 Cem Dilçin, Fuzûli’nin Şiiri Üzerine İncelemeler, İstanbul 2007, Kabalcı Yay.
 Mertol Tulum, Tarihî Metin Çalışmalarında Usul, Deniz Kitabevi, İstanbul 2000.
 M. Fatih Köksal, Tenkit ve Teori, İstanbul 2012, Kesit Yay.
Required Course Material(s)  KÖKSAL, M. Fatih, and Mezîdoğlu Ömer. "MECMÛ’ATÜ’N-NEZÂ’İR’İN TANINMAYAN MUHTASAR BİR NÜSHASI." I. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Kültür Kurultayı: 9-15 Nisan 2006, Çeşme-İzmir: bildiri kitabı 4 (2007): 14-35.
 Orhan Yavuz, “Prof. Dr. Saim Sakaoğlu’nun “Karaca Oğlan” Adlı Eserinin Bilimsel Eleştirisi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, ss. 15-111. http://www.turkiyat.selcuk.edu.tr/pdfdergi/s17/yavuz.pdf
 Mustafa Tatçı , "Yunus Emre´ye Ait Divânlar, Divân Naşirleri ve Metin Tamiri Meselesi." Millî Eğitim 83 (1989): 60-71.
 İ. Hakkı AKSOYAK, “OSMANLI ŞAİRLERİNİN “ARUZ TASARRUFLARI” VE ARAŞTIRMACILARIN GEREKSİZ MÜDAHALELERİ”, Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 3/6 Fall 2008,ss.59-74.


  Assessment Methods and Assessment Criteria
Semester/Year Assessments Number Contribution Percentage
    Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) 1 100
    Homeworks/Projects/Others 0 0
Total 100
Rate of Semester/Year Assessments to Success 40
 
Final Assessments 100
Rate of Final Assessments to Success 60
Total 100

  Contribution of the Course to Key Learning Outcomes
# Key Learning Outcome Contribution*
1 Knows periods of Islamic history and differences between them 1
2 Has enough detailed information about the emergence, development and impacts of Islamic Civilization to be able to compare muslim societies in terms of their socio-cultural and economic features. 2
3 In these fields student gains a interdisciplinary methodological, synthesist and critical point of view on political, cultural and social history, and is able to apply this in his/her studies. 4
4 Recognizes the forms of Turkish-Islamic Literature and may read and understand the original samples of those forms 5
5 Has knowledge of general theory of Music 0
6 Knows the history and characteristics of architectural and decorative arts 0
7 Has an understanding of aesthetical thought 5
8 Can translate historical and literary texts from Ottoman Turkish to modern Turkish 5
9 Gains a historical and literary point of view in the frame of Turkish-Islamic culture 5
10 Can refer to the books or manuscripts written in Ottoman Turkish while doing his/her research 5
11 Has information about the forms of Turkish-religious music and is able to perform these forms 0
12 Can carry out scientific activities with a critical point of view. 5
13 Apprehends the relation between culture, civlization and history 4
* Contribution levels are between 0 (not) and 5 (maximum).

  Student Workload - ECTS
Works Number Time (Hour) Total Workload (Hour)
Course Related Works
    Class Time (Exam weeks are excluded) 14 3 42
    Out of Class Study (Preliminary Work, Practice) 14 4 56
Assesment Related Works
    Homeworks, Projects, Others 0 0 0
    Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) 1 1 1
    Final Exam 1 1 1
Total Workload: 100
Total Workload / 25 (h): 4
ECTS Credit: 4