|
Course Description |
|
Course Name |
: |
CoupleTherapy for Couples Having Different Characteristics II |
|
Course Code |
: |
PDR 768 |
|
Course Type |
: |
Optional |
|
Level of Course |
: |
Second Cycle |
|
Year of Study |
: |
1 |
|
Course Semester |
: |
Spring (16 Weeks) |
|
ECTS |
: |
6 |
|
Name of Lecturer(s) |
: |
Asst.Prof. METEHAN ÇELİK |
|
Learning Outcomes of the Course |
: |
Practices different identity and councelling skills. Learns different identity and uses techniques and methods. Specifies different identity and therapeutic skills. Specifies different identity and therapeutic conditions. Learns different identity and case analysis.
|
|
Mode of Delivery |
: |
Face-to-Face |
|
Prerequisites and Co-Prerequisites |
: |
None |
|
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
: |
None |
|
Aim(s) of Course |
: |
The overall aim of the course is to learn and practice the councelleing skills that are done in different identities |
|
Course Contents |
: |
The course consists of counselling skills, technique and methods, practices, case examples etc. |
|
Language of Instruction |
: |
Turkish |
|
Work Place |
: |
Classroom |
|
|
Course Outline /Schedule (Weekly) Planned Learning Activities |
| Week | Subject | Student's Preliminary Work | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
1 |
Performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
2 |
Performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation,formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
3 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
4 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
5 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
6 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
7 |
Midterm Exam |
|
|
|
8 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
9 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
10 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
11 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
12 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
13 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
14 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
15 |
performing data analysis |
reporting the consultation, formulating a hypothesis |
question-answer, interactive participation, lecture. |
|
16/17 |
Exam |
|
|
|
|
|
Required Course Resources |
| Resource Type | Resource Name |
| Recommended Course Material(s) |
Gladding, S.T. (2006) Family Therapy, history, theory and practice.; Chıbucos, T. R.; Leıte, R. W. (2005) Readings in family theory.
|
| |
| Required Course Material(s) | |
|
|
|
Assessment Methods and Assessment Criteria |
|
Semester/Year Assessments |
Number |
Contribution Percentage |
|
Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) |
1 |
30 |
|
Homeworks/Projects/Others |
5 |
70 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
Rate of Semester/Year Assessments to Success |
40 |
|
|
Final Assessments
|
100 |
|
Rate of Final Assessments to Success
|
60 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
|
| Contribution of the Course to Key Learning Outcomes |
| # | Key Learning Outcome | Contribution* |
|
1 |
On the basis of the Educational Sciences BA degree qualificatons, improves his/her knowledge in the same field at the level of expertise.
|
5 |
|
2 |
Understands the multi-dimensional causes of a problem and evaluates the problem as a whole |
5 |
|
3 |
Analyzes a scientific article in the field of educational sciences. |
5 |
|
4 |
Uses the theoretical and practical knowledge s/he gained at the level of expertise in the field of educational sciences. |
5 |
|
5 |
Uses and develops individual assessment techniques. |
5 |
|
6 |
Guides the graduates of the field of educational sciencies within the framework of the knowledge and experiences that specialized training provides. |
4 |
|
7 |
Gains knowledge and experience about the appliations which can make the field of expertise functional in educational field. |
4 |
|
8 |
Makes prediction about the partner behaviors through the applications concerning the field of expertise. |
5 |
|
9 |
Solves a problem in the context of educational sciences in a scientific perspective. |
4 |
|
10 |
Integrates the theoretical knowledge within the scope of the field of educational sciences with the field of application. |
4 |
|
11 |
Takes responsibility for solving the problems at the local and national level during the educational science-oriented applications.
|
5 |
|
12 |
Communicates effectively and properly with students, teachers, school administrators, and members of families and working group. |
5 |
|
13 |
Has a good command of foreign language to be able to follow the foreign resources related to the field. |
5 |
|
14 |
Informs his/her colleagues about the processes regarding the field of expertise and conclusions reached. |
5 |
|
15 |
Uses the different statistical techniques and information and communication technologies that s/he needs in the field of expertise. |
5 |
|
16 |
Provides the support of the institution employees to make the applications concerning educational sciences successful. |
5 |
|
17 |
Develops internalized knowledge in the field of expertise and the related disciplines at the level of expertise. |
5 |
|
18 |
Identifies the sources of the problems in the field of educational sciences and contributes to the solution of these problems. |
5 |
|
19 |
Provides the cooperation of all partners in educational environment stating the necessity of the field of expertise. |
5 |
|
20 |
Assesses the necessities which reveal through the applications related to the field of expertise in a critical way. |
5 |
| * Contribution levels are between 0 (not) and 5 (maximum). |
|
|
| Student Workload - ECTS |
| Works | Number | Time (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
| Course Related Works |
|
Class Time (Exam weeks are excluded) |
14 |
3 |
42 |
|
Out of Class Study (Preliminary Work, Practice) |
14 |
3 |
42 |
| Assesment Related Works |
|
Homeworks, Projects, Others |
5 |
7 |
35 |
|
Mid-term Exams (Written, Oral, etc.) |
1 |
10 |
10 |
|
Final Exam |
1 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total Workload: | 139 |
| Total Workload / 25 (h): | 5.56 |
| ECTS Credit: | 6 |
|
|
|